Fitzsimmons v. Board of Canvassers
77 N.W. 632, 119 Mich. 147, 1898 Mich. LEXIS 67
Opinion
The order or judgment brought into this court by certiorari was simply affirmed. The rules adopted after the amendment to the Constitution in 1893 prescribe the method for bringing this class of mandamus cases to this court. The original papers are in the court below. We are of the opinion that the proceeding is still in that court, and that further steps in the case, if necessary, must be initiated there. That court has jurisdiction of the case, and the contempt proceeding must be there instituted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fitzsimmons v. Board of Canvassers, 77 N.W. 632, 119 Mich. 147, 1898 Mich. LEXIS 67 (Mich. 1898).
77 N.W. 632 (Fitzsimmons v. Board of Canvassers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Matter of Summerville
384 N.W.2d 152 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1986)
People v. Joseph
179 N.W.2d 383 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1970)
State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Martin
1927 OK 147 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1927)