Fitzsimmons v. Board of Canvassers

Michigan Supreme Court

Fitzsimmons v. Board of Canvassers

77 N.W. 632, 119 Mich. 147, 1898 Mich. LEXIS 67

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 28, 1898

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 77 N.W. 632 (Fitzsimmons v. Board of Canvassers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fitzsimmons v. Board of Canvassers, 77 N.W. 632, 119 Mich. 147, 1898 Mich. LEXIS 67 (Mich. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order or judgment brought into this court by certiorari was simply affirmed. The rules adopted after the amendment to the Constitution in 1893 prescribe the method for bringing this class of mandamus cases to this court. The original papers are in the court below. We are of the opinion that the proceeding is still in that court, and that further steps in the case, if necessary, must be initiated there. That court has jurisdiction of the case, and the contempt proceeding must be there instituted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The order or judgment brought into this court by certiorari was simply affirmed. The rules adopted after the amendment to the Constitution in 1893 prescribe the method for bringing this class of mandamus cases to this court. The original papers are in the court below. We are of the opinion that the proceeding is still in that court, and that further steps in the case, if necessary, must be initiated there. That court has jurisdiction of the case, and the contempt proceeding must be there instituted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 N.W. 632, 119 Mich. 147, 1898 Mich. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzsimmons-v-board-of-canvassers-mich-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack