Fitzroy v. Card
1 Johns. Cas. 30
This text of 1 Johns. Cas. 30 (Fitzroy v. Card) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fitzroy v. Card, 1 Johns. Cas. 30 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).
Opinion
It is a rule of practice, without exception, that whenever a special motion is to be made, founded on an affidavit, a copy of such affidavit must be regularly served on the opposite party.
Rule refused.
C. C. 63. Campbell v. Grove, infra, vol. 2, 105. Bergen v. Boerum, 2 Caines’ R. 256, 258, N. B. Clark v. Frost, 3 id. 125. Wilcox v. Howland, 6 Cowen, 576. Graham’s Prac. 2d edit. 678.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Johns. Cas. 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzroy-v-card-nysupct-1799.