Fitzpatrick v. Pope

30 N.E.2d 681, 307 Mass. 611, 1940 Mass. LEXIS 1078
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided December 10, 1940·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The judge was right in dismissing the petition for mandamus to require a recount of the votes for selectman. A condition of a recount is that the initial “statement” signed by voters must bear “a certificate by the registrars of voters of the number of names of subscribers which are names of registered voters in such ward or town.” G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 54, § 135, as amended by St. 1933, c. 270, St. 1935, c. 59, § 1, and St. 1938, c. 250, § 1. That condition was not performed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fitzpatrick v. Pope, 30 N.E.2d 681, 307 Mass. 611, 1940 Mass. LEXIS 1078 (Mass. 1940).

30 N.E.2d 681 (Fitzpatrick v. Pope) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Desjourdy v. Board of Registrars of Voters of Uxbridge
266 N.E.2d 672 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1971)
Berardi v. Registrars of Voters
64 N.E.2d 100 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1945)