Fitzpatrick v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
16 Jones & S. 539
This text of 16 Jones & S. 539 (Fitzpatrick v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fitzpatrick v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 16 Jones & S. 539 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1882).
Opinion
The court at General Term, after stating the facts, as above, held:
“Upon the whole case, it affirmatively and clearly appeared that the deceased, in attempting to cross as he did, was guilty of contributory negligence, and the complaint was properly dismissed.”
[541]*541Opinion of Freedman J.; Sedgwick, Ch. J., concurred.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 Jones & S. 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzpatrick-v-new-york-new-haven-hartford-railroad-nysuperctnyc-1882.