Fitzpatrick v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
16 Jones & S. 539
Opinion
The court at General Term, after stating the facts, as above, held:
“Upon the whole case, it affirmatively and clearly appeared that the deceased, in attempting to cross as he did, was guilty of contributory negligence, and the complaint was properly dismissed.”
[541] Opinion of Freedman J.; Sedgwick, Ch. J., concurred.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fitzpatrick v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 16 Jones & S. 539 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1882).
16 Jones & S. 539 (Fitzpatrick v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.