Fitzpatrick v. . New York, New Haven and Hartford Rd. Co.

98 N.Y. 649, 1885 N.Y. LEXIS 711
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 3, 1885·Published

Opinion

Per euria~m mem.

for reversal on the ground that the trial court erred in noosuiting plaintiff, that the case should have been submitted to the jury.

All concur, except RAPALLO, J., not voting.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fitzpatrick v. . New York, New Haven and Hartford Rd. Co., 98 N.Y. 649, 1885 N.Y. LEXIS 711 (N.Y. 1885).

98 N.Y. 649 (Fitzpatrick v. . New York, New Haven and Hartford Rd. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.