Fitzpatrick v. New York Elevated Railroad

69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 621
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1891
StatusPublished

This text of 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 621 (Fitzpatrick v. New York Elevated Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fitzpatrick v. New York Elevated Railroad, 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 621 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Opinion

Opinion

JPer Oimam

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

[622]*622Otto Heinze and others, Respondents, v. Oliver W. Buckingham and others, Appellants.—

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.

Opinion by Barrett, J. \

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzpatrick-v-new-york-elevated-railroad-nysupct-1891.