Fitzpatrick v. Moore

16 S.W. 7, 53 Ark. 4, 1890 Ark. LEXIS 142
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMarch 1, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 S.W. 7 (Fitzpatrick v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fitzpatrick v. Moore, 16 S.W. 7, 53 Ark. 4, 1890 Ark. LEXIS 142 (Ark. 1890).

Opinion

PER Curiam.

The consideration of the contract is not set forth in the written evidence of it, and the proof to show what the consideration was does not vary the terms of the writing. The court’s finding of facts is sustained by the evidence, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

J. H. Magill Lumber Co. v. Lane-White Lumber Co.
119 S.W. 822 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 S.W. 7, 53 Ark. 4, 1890 Ark. LEXIS 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzpatrick-v-moore-ark-1890.