Fitzpatrick v. Moore
16 S.W. 7, 53 Ark. 4, 1890 Ark. LEXIS 142
Opinion
The consideration of the contract is not set forth in the written evidence of it, and the proof to show what the consideration was does not vary the terms of the writing. The court’s finding of facts is sustained by the evidence, and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fitzpatrick v. Moore, 16 S.W. 7, 53 Ark. 4, 1890 Ark. LEXIS 142 (Ark. 1890).
16 S.W. 7 (Fitzpatrick v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J. H. Magill Lumber Co. v. Lane-White Lumber Co.
119 S.W. 822 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1909)