Fitzpatrick v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N

917 So. 2d 997, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20369, 2005 WL 3555828
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 2005·No. 1D05-3991·Published

Opinion

917 So.2d 997 (2005)

Ernest FITZPATRICK, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee.

No. 1D05-3991.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 30, 2005.

*998 Appellant, pro se.

Kim Fluharty, General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant's response to the Court's order of September 27, 2005, the Court has determined that the lower tribunal's August 1, 2005, order is not an appealable order. See Banks v. State, 916 So.2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

BARFIELD, WOLF, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fitzpatrick v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N, 917 So. 2d 997, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20369, 2005 WL 3555828 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

917 So. 2d 997 (Fitzpatrick v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Banks v. State
916 So. 2d 35 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)