Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Fitzpatrick v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N

Fitzpatrick v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N

917 So. 2d 997, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20369, 2005 WL 3555828
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 30, 2005
Docket1D05-3991
StatusPublished

This text of 917 So. 2d 997 (Fitzpatrick v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fitzpatrick v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N, 917 So. 2d 997, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20369, 2005 WL 3555828 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

917 So.2d 997 (2005)

Ernest FITZPATRICK, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee.

No. 1D05-3991.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 30, 2005.

*998 Appellant, pro se.

Kim Fluharty, General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant's response to the Court's order of September 27, 2005, the Court has determined that the lower tribunal's August 1, 2005, order is not an appealable order. See Banks v. State, 916 So.2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

BARFIELD, WOLF, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Banks v. State
916 So. 2d 35 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
917 So. 2d 997, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20369, 2005 WL 3555828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzpatrick-v-florida-parole-comn-fladistctapp-2005.