Fitzpatrick v. Fitchburg Railroad
128 Mass. 13, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 155
Opinion
The testimony was competent to prove that the boy had been previously warned, and was therefore aware of the danger, as tending to show that he was not using due care at the time of the accident; and it does not appear to have been admitted for any other purpose.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fitzpatrick v. Fitchburg Railroad, 128 Mass. 13, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 155 (Mass. 1879).
128 Mass. 13 (Fitzpatrick v. Fitchburg Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robbins v. Athol Gas & Electric Co.
128 N.E. 417 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1920)
Platter v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad
143 N.W. 992 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1913)
Frederickson v. Iowa Central Railway Co.
135 N.W. 12 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1912)
Craven v. Central Pacific Railroad
13 P. 878 (California Supreme Court, 1887)