Fitzpatrick v. BETANZOS

775 N.W.2d 756, 485 Mich. 1013

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fitzpatrick v. BETANZOS. Read the opinion of the Court — 484 Mich. 872 →

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided December 21, 2009·No. 138807·Published

Opinion

775 N.W.2d 756 (2009)

Patricia FITZPATRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Teresa BETANZOS and Raphael Betanzos, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 138807. COA No. 282719.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

December 21, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's August 6, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

775 N.W.2d 756 (2009)

Patricia FITZPATRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Teresa BETANZOS and Raphael Betanzos, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 138807. COA No. 282719.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

December 21, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's August 6, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

Fitzpatrick v. BETANZOS, 775 N.W.2d 756, 485 Mich. 1013 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

775 N.W.2d 756 (Fitzpatrick v. BETANZOS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Patricia FITZPATRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Teresa BETANZOS and Raphael Betanzos, Defendants-Appellees.

Order

Patricia FITZPATRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Teresa BETANZOS and Raphael Betanzos, Defendants-Appellees.