Fitzpatrick v. B. F. Goodrich Co.
172 A.D. 924, 157 N.Y.S. 1125
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1916
StatusPublished
This text of 172 A.D. 924 (Fitzpatrick v. B. F. Goodrich Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fitzpatrick v. B. F. Goodrich Co., 172 A.D. 924, 157 N.Y.S. 1125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.- The order is not sufficiently broad to permit the plaintiff to be examined concerning specific convictions, as it does not contemplate the taking of illegal evidence. (Oakes v. Star Co., 119 App. Div. 358.) Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Oakes v. Star Co.
119 A.D. 358 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
172 A.D. 924, 157 N.Y.S. 1125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzpatrick-v-b-f-goodrich-co-nyappdiv-1916.