Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Fitzmahony v. Caulfield

Fitzmahony v. Caulfield

46 N.Y.S. 1091
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 7, 1897
StatusPublished

This text of 46 N.Y.S. 1091 (Fitzmahony v. Caulfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fitzmahony v. Caulfield, 46 N.Y.S. 1091 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1897).

Opinion

No opinion. Order reversed on authority of Good v. Daland, 119 N. Y. 153, 23 N. Y. Supp. 474. The admission was merely that the attorney had been served with a copy of the paper, not that the paper was a correct copy of the judgment. Plaintiff’s motion granted. No costs of this appeal, but appellant may have her disbursements. See 33 N. Y. Supp. 876.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Good v. . Daland
23 N.E. 474 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
People ex rel. Fisk v. Board of Education
23 N.Y.S. 473 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)
Fitzmahoney v. Caulfield
33 N.Y.S. 876 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 N.Y.S. 1091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzmahony-v-caulfield-nyappdiv-1897.