Fitzhugh's Administratrix v. Beale
4 Munf. 186, 18 Va. 186, 1815 Va. LEXIS 7
Opinion
the president pronounced the court’s opinion, that both judgments be reversed, and judgment entered for the plaintiff in error; the evidence demurred to by him not being sufficient in law to maintain the action, even admitting the deposition of Catharine Alexander to have been legal evidence; consequently, the demurrer ought to have been sustained, instead of being overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fitzhugh's Administratrix v. Beale, 4 Munf. 186, 18 Va. 186, 1815 Va. LEXIS 7 (Va. 1815).
4 Munf. 186 (Fitzhugh's Administratrix v. Beale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Echert v. Ferst
1 Foster 329 (Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, 1873)
Hunt's Adm'r v. Martin's Adm'r
8 Va. 578 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1852)
Baker v. Fales
16 Mass. 147 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1819)
Badger v. Phinney
15 Mass. 359 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1819)