Home/California Court of Appeal/Fitzhugh v. Freeman

Fitzhugh v. Freeman

269 P. 669, 93 Cal. App. 796
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedAugust 16, 1928
DocketDocket No. 5692.
StatusPublished

This text of 269 P. 669 (Fitzhugh v. Freeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fitzhugh v. Freeman, 269 P. 669, 93 Cal. App. 796 (Cal. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

[1] Except as to the amounts the facts are parallel with the facts in the case of Granite Rock Co. v. Freeman et al.,ante, p. 507 [269 P. 668. For the reasons there stated the judgment is affirmed.

Nourse, J., and Buck, P.J., pro tem., concurred.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Granite Rock Co. v. Freeman
269 P. 668 (California Court of Appeal, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 P. 669, 93 Cal. App. 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzhugh-v-freeman-calctapp-1928.