Fitzgibbons v. State
553 So. 2d 282, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2759, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6605, 1989 WL 142685
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 28, 1989
DocketNo. 89-366
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 553 So. 2d 282 (Fitzgibbons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fitzgibbons v. State, 553 So. 2d 282, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2759, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6605, 1989 WL 142685 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
Opinion
The revocation of defendant’s probation is affirmed. The State concedes that defendant must be resentenced to a term not in excess of one cell above the guideline sentence, Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989), and that defendant must be given credit for his county jail sentence. State v. Green, 547 So.2d 925 (Fla.1989).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Feldman v. Glucroft
553 So. 2d 282 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
553 So. 2d 282, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2759, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6605, 1989 WL 142685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzgibbons-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.