Fitzgibbon v. Calvert

39 Cal. 261
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1870
DocketNo. 2,109
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 39 Cal. 261 (Fitzgibbon v. Calvert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fitzgibbon v. Calvert, 39 Cal. 261 (Cal. 1870).

Opinion

Sprague, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is a suit upon an undertaking executed by defendants as a substitute for property ordered to be levied upon by the Sheriff by virtue of a writ of attachment in his hands, in a certain suit previously commenced in the Fifteenth District Court, by this plaintiff, against one Caleb Hyatt.

Ho material allegation of plaintiff’s complaint is denied by defendants, and the substantive matter as pleaded in the answer, even if proved as alleged, is no defense. The execution of the undertaking by defendants, and the consideration therefor—the subsequent judgment against the defendant, in the case in which the attachment was issued—the issuance of execution on said judgment against the judgment debtor in said suit, and return of said execution before the commencement of this suit, nulla bona, are substantially admitted or not sufficiently denied by the answer. The plaintiff, therefore, would have been entitled to judgment upon the pleadings, on motion. Upon the trial, however, it was admitted by plaintiff that upon an alias execution issued and returned, the sum of five dollars had been made, for which these defendants were allowed a credit on the judgment awarded against them by the Court.

[262]*262We discover no error in the record, prejudicial to defendants.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horton v. Robert
11 P.R. 168 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1906)
Loveland v. Garner
15 P. 844 (California Supreme Court, 1887)
Estate of Wooten
56 Cal. 322 (California Supreme Court, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 Cal. 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzgibbon-v-calvert-cal-1870.