Fitzgibbins v. Yennie
Opinion
Action in claim and delivery for the possession of certain personal property. The property was taken by the sheriff, but was rebonded by and returned to defendant. Whereupon defendant moved to “set aside and vacate” the action on the ground that it could not be maintained since by the complaint it appears that the parties to the action are owners of the property as tenants in common. The motion was denied and defendant appealed. Plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order is not appealable. [474]*474The motion is granted. The motion, below to “vacate -and set aside the action” was in effect a motion to dismiss the action and the order denying the same is clearly not appealable. Pillsbury v. Foley, 61 Minn. 434, 63 N. W. 1027.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
157 N.W. 114 (Fitzgibbins v. Yennie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.