Fitzgerrel v. Furgeson

25 Ill. 138
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1860
StatusPublished

This text of 25 Ill. 138 (Fitzgerrel v. Furgeson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fitzgerrel v. Furgeson, 25 Ill. 138 (Ill. 1860).

Opinion

Caton, C. J.

The affidavit for a continuance may have been insufficient, in not stating specifically what the defendant expected to prove by the absent witnesses. But the court erred in not allowing the defendant to withdraw his plea of justification. The case of Ayres v. Kelly, 11 Ill. 17, is conclusive on this point. Were this a new question before this court, we might be disposed to leave it with the discretion of the court below; but we feel it our duty to follow the decision which was made by a majority of the court, rather than keep the decisions of this court fluctuating and vacillating.

The judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ayres v. Kelley
11 Ill. 17 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1849)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Ill. 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzgerrel-v-furgeson-ill-1860.