Fitzgerald v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Fitzgerald v. State

113 S.E. 50, 28 Ga. App. 760, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 843

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 11, 1922

Docket13662

StatusPublished

This text of 113 S.E. 50 (Fitzgerald v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fitzgerald v. State, 113 S.E. 50, 28 Ga. App. 760, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 843 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

Fitzgerald was indicted and convicted of the offense of unlawfully and maliciously cutting down, injuring and destroying certain trees growing upon the lands of another. The only assignment of error is that the evidence in the case does not authorize the verdict. Upon conflicting evidence the jury were authorized to convict the defendant. This verdict has the approval of the trial judge. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

■Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

Fitzgerald was indicted and convicted of the offense of unlawfully and maliciously cutting down, injuring and destroying certain trees growing upon the lands of another. The only assignment of error is that the evidence in the case does not authorize the verdict. Upon conflicting evidence the jury were authorized to convict the defendant. This verdict has the approval of the trial judge. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

■Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 S.E. 50, 28 Ga. App. 760, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzgerald-v-state-gactapp-1922.