Fitzgerald v. State
761 So. 2d 319, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 500, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1275, 2000 WL 796062
Opinion
We have for review the decision in Fitzgerald v. State, 708 So.2d 690 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), in which the Fifth District cited as controlling authority its opinion in Maddox v. State, 708 So.2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), approved in part, disapproved in part, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981). We quash the decision below and remand for the Fifth District to consider this case in light of our opinion in Maddox.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fitzgerald v. State, 761 So. 2d 319, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 500, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1275, 2000 WL 796062 (Fla. 2000).
761 So. 2d 319 (Fitzgerald v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Maddox v. State
708 So. 2d 617 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Jollie v. State
405 So. 2d 418 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Fitzgerald v. State
708 So. 2d 690 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)