Fitzgerald v. Personal Loan Service Inc.
This text of 161 S.E. 167 (Fitzgerald v. Personal Loan Service Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under tlie agreed statement of facts tlie judge of the municipal court of Atlanta, sitting -without the intervention of a jury, did not err in rendering judgment in favor of tlie plaintiff for tlie full amount sued for, nor thereafter in refusing to grant a new trial. The appellate division of the court properly affirmed the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial, and the judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to sanction the petition for certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
161 S.E. 167, 44 Ga. App. 272, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzgerald-v-personal-loan-service-inc-gactapp-1931.