Fitzgerald v. Hurwitz
Opinion
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court granting an exception of pre[413]*413maturity and dismissing plaintiff’s suit without prejudice. From that judgment, plaintiff appeals.
Plaintiff filed a medical malpractice action against Dr. Lowell M. Hurwitz and Chalmette General Hospital. Dr. Hurwitz is a health care provider certified as an enrollee under medical malpractice review panel. Plaintiff failed to file a claim under the panel prior to institution of suit as required under R.S. 40:1299.47(B)(l)(a)(i). Accordingly, the exception of prematurity was properly granted.
Plaintiff raises a totally irrelevant argument on the constitutionality of “caps” which has nothing to do with an exception of prematurity. This argument is totally without merit.
For the reasons discussed, the judgment below is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
517 So. 2d 412 (Fitzgerald v. Hurwitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.