Fitzgerald v. Hart
4 Mass. 429
Opinion
The defendant, in his plea, admits that the plaintiff has a right of action to recover forty-three dollars seventeen cents, and yet his plea goes to the action. Clearly it is bad. His defence is in equity, where the penalty will be reduced to the sum justly due.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fitzgerald v. Hart, 4 Mass. 429 (Mass. 1808).
4 Mass. 429 (Fitzgerald v. Hart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Braun ex rel. Steelsmith v. Braun
44 A. 1096 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)
McDonald v. McDonald
1 Mich. N.P. 191 (Circuit Court of the 10th Circuit of Michigan, 1870)