Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald
21 Tex. 415
Opinion
In this case the writ of error must be-dismissed for the want of a final judgment in the cause. There was a verdict for defendant, upon which there is a judgment for costs only ; but no such entry as that the plaintiffs take nothing by their suit, or other definitive sentence in favor of the defendant upon the matters contained in the record. It has been repeatedly held that the judgment for costs alone is not such final judgment as can be brought up for revision-(Warren v. Shuman et al., 5 Tex. R. 411.) Writ of error dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 21 Tex. 415 (Tex. 1858).
21 Tex. 415 (Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Joan DeYoung, Stephen DeYoung, M.D., and David DeYoung v. William L. Maynard, Individually and as of the Estate of Judy Page Maynard, and Maynard Properties, L.P.
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
in Re George Green and Garlan Green
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Elishah Sawyers, Pax Crate & Freight, Inc. and Robin Sawyers v. Marc Carter and Sally Carter
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)
Nelon v. Thomas
329 S.W.2d 148 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1959)
Kuehn v. Kuehn
232 S.W. 918 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1921)
Eastham v. Sallis
60 Tex. 576 (Texas Supreme Court, 1884)