Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald

27 A.D.2d 947, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4435

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 17, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 947 (Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 27 A.D.2d 947, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4435 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

—-Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal denied, on condition that appellant perfect and be ready to argue or submit the appeal at the September Term, beginning September 6, 1967; appeal ordered on the calendar for said Term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before July [948]*94810, 1967; and respondent’s brief must be served and filed before August 15, 1967. Cross motion by appellant insofar as it is to enlarge his time to perfect appeal granted and time enlarged to the September Term. (See motion decided herewith.) Cross motion by appellant insofar as it is to dispense with printing and to reproduce his brief and appendix by Xerography dismissed, as unecessary. Reproduction by Xerography is an approved method by which an appeal may be prosecuted (see CPLR 5529; Rules App. Div. 2d Dept., Part 1, rule I, subd. [3], eff. Mar. 27, 1967). Beldoek, P. J., Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Nolan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—-Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal denied, on condition that appellant perfect and be ready to argue or submit the appeal at the September Term, beginning September 6, 1967; appeal ordered on the calendar for said Term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before July [948]*94810, 1967; and respondent’s brief must be served and filed before August 15, 1967. Cross motion by appellant insofar as it is to enlarge his time to perfect appeal granted and time enlarged to the September Term. (See motion decided herewith.) Cross motion by appellant insofar as it is to dispense with printing and to reproduce his brief and appendix by Xerography dismissed, as unecessary. Reproduction by Xerography is an approved method by which an appeal may be prosecuted (see CPLR 5529; Rules App. Div. 2d Dept., Part 1, rule I, subd. [3], eff. Mar. 27, 1967). Beldoek, P. J., Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Nolan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 947, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzgerald-v-fitzgerald-nyappdiv-1967.