Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Fitzgerald v. Conroy

Fitzgerald v. Conroy

57 A.D.3d 939, 869 N.Y.2d 800
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 30, 2008
StatusPublished

This text of 57 A.D.3d 939 (Fitzgerald v. Conroy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fitzgerald v. Conroy, 57 A.D.3d 939, 869 N.Y.2d 800 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Balancing all relevant factors, and under the circumstances of this case, we find that the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs motion for leave to serve an amended complaint (see CPLR 3025 [b]; 105 [u]; Thomsen v Suffolk County Police Dept., 50 AD3d 1015, 1016-1017 [2008]; Dialcom, LLC v AT & T Corp., 50 AD3d 727 [2008]). Ritter, J.E, Florio, Miller and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dialcom, LLC v. AT & T Corp.
50 A.D.3d 727 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Thomsen v. Suffolk County Police Department
50 A.D.3d 1015 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A.D.3d 939, 869 N.Y.2d 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzgerald-v-conroy-nyappdiv-2008.