Fitzgerald v. City of Petersburg

Fourth Circuit

Fitzgerald v. City of Petersburg

592 F. App'x 227

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 18, 2015·No. No. 14-2077·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Howard M. and Patricia A. Fitzgerald appeal the district court’s orders denying their motions for reconsideration. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fitzgerald v. City of Petersburg, No. 3:14-cv-00333-HEH (E.D.Va. Aug. 12, 2014 & Sept. 9, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Howard M. and Patricia A. Fitzgerald appeal the district court’s orders denying their motions for reconsideration. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fitzgerald v. City of Petersburg, No. 3:14-cv-00333-HEH (E.D.Va. Aug. 12, 2014 & Sept. 9, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Fitzgerald v. City of Petersburg, 592 F. App'x 227 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

592 F. App'x 227 (Fitzgerald v. City of Petersburg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.