Fitzgerald v. Christen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fitzgerald v. Christen

60 A.D.2d 844, 400 N.Y.S.2d 573, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9861

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 3, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 60 A.D.2d 844 (Fitzgerald v. Christen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fitzgerald v. Christen, 60 A.D.2d 844, 400 N.Y.S.2d 573, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to enjoin respondents from conducting a special national teachers’ bilingual examination, petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 3,1977, which, inter alia, denied the application and dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Absent constitutional or statutory violations, it is not for us to question the wisdom or the policy of the respondent educators; the questions raised on this appeal are not proper subjects for judicial review (see James v Board of Educ., 42 NY2d 357). Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to enjoin respondents from conducting a special national teachers’ bilingual examination, petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 3,1977, which, inter alia, denied the application and dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Absent constitutional or statutory violations, it is not for us to question the wisdom or the policy of the respondent educators; the questions raised on this appeal are not proper subjects for judicial review (see James v Board of Educ., 42 NY2d 357). Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.2d 844, 400 N.Y.S.2d 573, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzgerald-v-christen-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack