Fitzgerald Speer Co. v. Kelly

85 A. 1134, 83 N.J.L. 626, 54 Vroom 626, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 194
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 18, 1912
StatusPublished

This text of 85 A. 1134 (Fitzgerald Speer Co. v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fitzgerald Speer Co. v. Kelly, 85 A. 1134, 83 N.J.L. 626, 54 Vroom 626, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 194 (N.J. 1912).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that court by the Chief Justiee.

For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Bergen, Yoorhees, Kaltsch, Bogert, Yeedenburgh, Congpon, White, Treaoy, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 A. 1134, 83 N.J.L. 626, 54 Vroom 626, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzgerald-speer-co-v-kelly-nj-1912.