Fitzgerald Cotton Mills v. Holt, Gant & Holt Cotton Manufacturing Co.
170 N.C. 670
Opinion
The evidence offered by tbe defendant tending to prove a breach of warranty does not support tbe allegations of tbe answer, in which it is not alleged tbat there was a breach of warranty as to workmanship or quality, and as tbe defendant used tbe warps, tbe case is controlled by Parker v. Fenwick, 138 N. C., 209, and Robinson v. Huffstetler, 165 N. C., 459.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fitzgerald Cotton Mills v. Holt, Gant & Holt Cotton Manufacturing Co., 170 N.C. 670 (N.C. 1915).
170 N.C. 670 (Fitzgerald Cotton Mills v. Holt, Gant & Holt Cotton Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robinson v. . Huffstetler
81 S.E. 753 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1914)
Parker v. Fenwick.
50 S.E. 627 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1905)