Fitzgerald Cotton Mills v. Holt, Gant & Holt Cotton Manufacturing Co.

170 N.C. 670
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 24, 1915
StatusPublished

This text of 170 N.C. 670 (Fitzgerald Cotton Mills v. Holt, Gant & Holt Cotton Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fitzgerald Cotton Mills v. Holt, Gant & Holt Cotton Manufacturing Co., 170 N.C. 670 (N.C. 1915).

Opinion

Per Cueiam.

The evidence offered by tbe defendant tending to prove a breach of warranty does not support tbe allegations of tbe answer, in which it is not alleged tbat there was a breach of warranty as to workmanship or quality, and as tbe defendant used tbe warps, tbe case is controlled by Parker v. Fenwick, 138 N. C., 209, and Robinson v. Huffstetler, 165 N. C., 459.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. . Huffstetler
81 S.E. 753 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1914)
Parker v. Fenwick.
50 S.E. 627 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 N.C. 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzgerald-cotton-mills-v-holt-gant-holt-cotton-manufacturing-co-nc-1915.