Fitton v. United Electric Light & Power Co.

160 A.D. 898

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the evenc, because of error in the charge of the trial court at folio 206. (See Lesin v. Shapiro, 147 App. Div. 100; Coble v. Potter, 155 id. 716.) Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fitton v. United Electric Light & Power Co., 160 A.D. 898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

160 A.D. 898 (Fitton v. United Electric Light & Power Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lesin v. Shapiro
147 A.D. 100 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)