Fite v. Whittemore

Supreme Court of Georgia

Fite v. Whittemore

146 S.E. 844, 167 Ga. 900, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 59

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 19, 1929

DocketNo. 6563

StatusPublished

This text of 146 S.E. 844 (Fite v. Whittemore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fite v. Whittemore, 146 S.E. 844, 167 Ga. 900, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 59 (Ga. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

The amendment in aid of the levy involved in this ease was in substance a complaint at law seeking a personal judgment for breach of warranty. Being of this character, the bill of exceptions assigning error on the judgment dismissing the action presents a case of which the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction, and the writ of error is not within the jurisdiction of this court.

Transferred to Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur. Y. Ar Henderson and J. M. Lang, for plaintiff. J. G. B„ Hnoin and F. A. Cantrell, for defendant

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, J.

The amendment in aid of the levy involved in this ease was in substance a complaint at law seeking a personal judgment for breach of warranty. Being of this character, the bill of exceptions assigning error on the judgment dismissing the action presents a case of which the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction, and the writ of error is not within the jurisdiction of this court.

Transferred to Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur. Y. Ar Henderson and J. M. Lang, for plaintiff. J. G. B„ Hnoin and F. A. Cantrell, for defendant

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 S.E. 844, 167 Ga. 900, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fite-v-whittemore-ga-1929.