Fite v. Black

17 S.E. 349, 92 Ga. 363
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 3, 1893·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[364]*364 Judgment affirmed.

The respondent excepted to both orders mentioned. Errors are specially assigned, in that the court should not have awarded twenty per cent, interest on the principal debt; that the rule should not have been made absolute without evidence to sustain the petition; that the recital of any admission in the answer was error, because the respondent made no admission of any kind whatever upon the hearing of the cause; and that the petition should have been dismissed for want of proof to support it, or the same should have been submitted to a jury to ascertain whether it was so sustained. Albert S. Johnson, for plaintiff in error. Dabney & Fouché, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fite v. Black, 17 S.E. 349, 92 Ga. 363 (Ga. 1893).

17 S.E. 349 (Fite v. Black) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kimzey v. Mickel
12 S.E.2d 567 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Wyles v. Berry
76 S.W. 126 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1903)