Fite v. Black

Supreme Court of Georgia

Fite v. Black

17 S.E. 349, 92 Ga. 363

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 3, 1893

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 17 S.E. 349 (Fite v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fite v. Black, 17 S.E. 349, 92 Ga. 363 (Ga. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

[364]*364 Judgment affirmed.

The respondent excepted to both orders mentioned. Errors are specially assigned, in that the court should not have awarded twenty per cent, interest on the principal debt; that the rule should not have been made absolute without evidence to sustain the petition; that the recital of any admission in the answer was error, because the respondent made no admission of any kind whatever upon the hearing of the cause; and that the petition should have been dismissed for want of proof to support it, or the same should have been submitted to a jury to ascertain whether it was so sustained.

Albert S. Johnson, for plaintiff in error. Dabney & Fouché, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[364]*364 Judgment affirmed.

The respondent excepted to both orders mentioned. Errors are specially assigned, in that the court should not have awarded twenty per cent, interest on the principal debt; that the rule should not have been made absolute without evidence to sustain the petition; that the recital of any admission in the answer was error, because the respondent made no admission of any kind whatever upon the hearing of the cause; and that the petition should have been dismissed for want of proof to support it, or the same should have been submitted to a jury to ascertain whether it was so sustained.

Albert S. Johnson, for plaintiff in error. Dabney & Fouché, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 S.E. 349, 92 Ga. 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fite-v-black-ga-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack