Fitchett v. Wilson
This text of 561 F. App'x 256 (Fitchett v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
William Fitchett and Brad R. Johnson appeal the district court’s order and judgment adopting in part the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing their civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fitchett v. Wilson, No. 4:12-cv-00605-RBH (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
561 F. App'x 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitchett-v-wilson-ca4-2014.