Fitchett v. County of Horry

Fourth Circuit

Fitchett v. County of Horry

473 F. App'x 248

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 15, 2012

DocketNo. 11-2379

StatusPublished

This text of 473 F. App'x 248 (Fitchett v. County of Horry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fitchett v. County of Horry, 473 F. App'x 248 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

William Fitchett and Brad R. Johnson appeal the district court’s orders and judgment accepting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and granting the Appellants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings and denying their motion for reconsideration under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59. We have reviewed the record, including the magistrate judge’s order denying the motion for leave to file an amended complaint, the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and the district court’s orders and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Fitchett v. County of Horry, No. 4:10-cv-01648-TLW, 2011 WL 4435746 (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 2011); (Nov. 16, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the - materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

William Fitchett and Brad R. Johnson appeal the district court’s orders and judgment accepting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and granting the Appellants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings and denying their motion for reconsideration under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59. We have reviewed the record, including the magistrate judge’s order denying the motion for leave to file an amended complaint, the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and the district court’s orders and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Fitchett v. County of Horry, No. 4:10-cv-01648-TLW, 2011 WL 4435746 (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 2011); (Nov. 16, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the - materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

473 F. App'x 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitchett-v-county-of-horry-ca4-2012.