Fitchburg R. v. Nichols

First Circuit

Fitchburg R. v. Nichols

85 F. 869, 29 C.C.A. 464, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2221

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedJanuary 20, 1898

DocketNo. 228

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 85 F. 869 (Fitchburg R. v. Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fitchburg R. v. Nichols, 85 F. 869, 29 C.C.A. 464, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2221 (1st Cir. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

The record in this case contains the suitable allegations to show the citizenship of the corporation defendant in the court below, but it fails in this respect as to the plaintiff below. There are only two courses open. If the plaintiff below is an alien, or a citizen of some state other than Massachusetts, the record may be amended in this court according to the truth by the consent of both parties. Fletcher v. Peck, 6 Cranch, 87, 127; Kennedy v. Bank, How. 586, 611; U. S. v. Hopewell, 51 Fed. 798, 800, 2 C. C. A. 510; Nashua & L. R. Corp. v. Boston & L. R. Corp., 9 C. C. A. 468, 61 Fed. 237, 245. If this is not done, the judgment of the court below must be reversed. It is not necessary to set aside the verdict, as the court below may allow an amendment, in accordance with the facts, to supply the defect, as well after verdict as before, provided it gives the adverse party an opportunity to meet the new issue thus raised, if that party is advised to do so. All this is not only in accordance with the general principles of law, but is emphasized by section 954 of the Revised Statutes, ¿nd paragraphs 1 and 3 of rule 11 of the circuit court. Of course, if an amendment is not made, or the issue made by it is not sustained, it will be the duty of the court below to dismiss .the suit. It is ordered that the judgment of the circuit court be reversed, without costs for either party in this court, and that the case be remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings according to law, unless an amendment is made in this court on or before February 1,1898, as provided in this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

The record in this case contains the suitable allegations to show the citizenship of the corporation defendant in the court below, but it fails in this respect as to the plaintiff below. There are only two courses open. If the plaintiff below is an alien, or a citizen of some state other than Massachusetts, the record may be amended in this court according to the truth by the consent of both parties. Fletcher v. Peck, 6 Cranch, 87, 127; Kennedy v. Bank, How. 586, 611; U. S. v. Hopewell, 51 Fed. 798, 800, 2 C. C. A. 510; Nashua & L. R. Corp. v. Boston & L. R. Corp., 9 C. C. A. 468, 61 Fed. 237, 245. If this is not done, the judgment of the court below must be reversed. It is not necessary to set aside the verdict, as the court below may allow an amendment, in accordance with the facts, to supply the defect, as well after verdict as before, provided it gives the adverse party an opportunity to meet the new issue thus raised, if that party is advised to do so. All this is not only in accordance with the general principles of law, but is emphasized by section 954 of the Revised Statutes, ¿nd paragraphs 1 and 3 of rule 11 of the circuit court. Of course, if an amendment is not made, or the issue made by it is not sustained, it will be the duty of the court below to dismiss .the suit. It is ordered that the judgment of the circuit court be reversed, without costs for either party in this court, and that the case be remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings according to law, unless an amendment is made in this court on or before February 1,1898, as provided in this opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 F. 869, 29 C.C.A. 464, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitchburg-r-v-nichols-ca1-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack