Fitch v. Richardson

First Circuit

Fitch v. Richardson

147 F. 196, 77 C.C.A. 422, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4216

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedFebruary 23, 1906

DocketNo. 607

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 147 F. 196 (Fitch v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fitch v. Richardson, 147 F. 196, 77 C.C.A. 422, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4216 (1st Cir. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was submitted by the appellee on brief, but the appellant has neither filed a brief nor applied to be heard orally. Under the rules and practice of the court, the appellee is entitled to have the appeal dismissed, or, perhaps, to have the judgment affirmed. Portland Company v. United States, 15 Wall. 1, 21 L. Ed. 113; Ryan v. Koch, 17 Wall. 19, 21 L. Ed. 611. Or, the court at its option might open the record and dispose of the case on its merits. In view of the fact that the appellee has filed a brief, the court might possibly do the latter of its own motion if the assignment of errors was of such a character that the court could see that it clearly and fairly presented the issues on the appeal. Such, however, is not the fact, and this to such an extent that it is impossible for the court to ascertain what the issues between the parties are without its going through the record. This, [197]*197of course, the court is not inclined to do. The appellee has not specially asked that the judgment be affirmed.

The following order will be entered:

Ordered: Unless the appellant files a brief, framed in accordance with the rules, on or before March 17, 1906, the appeal will be dismissed, with costs for the appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was submitted by the appellee on brief, but the appellant has neither filed a brief nor applied to be heard orally. Under the rules and practice of the court, the appellee is entitled to have the appeal dismissed, or, perhaps, to have the judgment affirmed. Portland Company v. United States, 15 Wall. 1, 21 L. Ed. 113; Ryan v. Koch, 17 Wall. 19, 21 L. Ed. 611. Or, the court at its option might open the record and dispose of the case on its merits. In view of the fact that the appellee has filed a brief, the court might possibly do the latter of its own motion if the assignment of errors was of such a character that the court could see that it clearly and fairly presented the issues on the appeal. Such, however, is not the fact, and this to such an extent that it is impossible for the court to ascertain what the issues between the parties are without its going through the record. This, [197]*197of course, the court is not inclined to do. The appellee has not specially asked that the judgment be affirmed.

The following order will be entered:

Ordered: Unless the appellant files a brief, framed in accordance with the rules, on or before March 17, 1906, the appeal will be dismissed, with costs for the appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 F. 196, 77 C.C.A. 422, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitch-v-richardson-ca1-1906.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack