Fitch v. Rempublicam

3 Yeates 49
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 15, 1800·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The indictment has not been drawn with accuracy. Though the word disseisivit may be taken to imply a freehold, yet it is not sufficient without shewing what estate the person disseised had. 1 Vent. 306. But the other words in the indictment seem sufficiently to shew that Beach was seized of a freehold estate, according to the authorities cited.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fitch v. Rempublicam, 3 Yeates 49 (Pa. 1800).

3 Yeates 49 (Fitch v. Rempublicam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Respublica v. Shryber
1 U.S. 68 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1782)