Fitch v. Nute
62 N.H. 700
This text of 62 N.H. 700 (Fitch v. Nute) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fitch v. Nute, 62 N.H. 700 (N.H. 1883).
Opinion
Assumpsit. The objection to the maintenance of the action was, that it was brought in the name of the wrong party. Without deciding the question raised, it was held that the writ might, if necessary, be amended at the trial term, and without terms.
Case discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Remick v. J. Spaulding & Sons Co.
131 A. 608 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1926)
Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Cameron
87 A. 254 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1913)
State Ex Rel. Thorndike v. Collins
36 A. 550 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1894)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
62 N.H. 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitch-v-nute-nh-1883.