Fitch v. Nute

62 N.H. 700
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1883·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Assumpsit. The objection to the maintenance of the action was, that it was brought in the name of the wrong party. Without deciding the question raised, it was held that the writ might, if necessary, be amended at the trial term, and without terms.

Case discharged.

Allen, J.,.did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fitch v. Nute, 62 N.H. 700 (N.H. 1883).

62 N.H. 700 (Fitch v. Nute) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Remick v. J. Spaulding & Sons Co.
131 A. 608 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1926)
Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Cameron
87 A. 254 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1913)
State Ex Rel. Thorndike v. Collins
36 A. 550 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1894)