Fitch v. Mitchell

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 2, 2010
Docket10-7162
StatusUnpublished

This text of Fitch v. Mitchell (Fitch v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fitch v. Mitchell, (4th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7162

DAVID KENT FITCH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

MARY M. MITCHELL, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (9:10-cv-00952-HFF)

Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: December 2, 2010

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Kent Fitch, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Kent Fitch, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241

(West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Fitch v. Mitchell, No.

9:10-cv-00952-HFF (D.S.C. July 7, 2010). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Fitch v. Mitchell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitch-v-mitchell-ca4-2010.