Fitch v. Livingston & Flanagan

7 How. Pr. 410
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 15, 1853
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 7 How. Pr. 410 (Fitch v. Livingston & Flanagan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fitch v. Livingston & Flanagan, 7 How. Pr. 410 (N.Y. 1853).

Opinion

On the 24th of January 1853, C. L. Benedict, the attorney and counsel for appellant, moved on notice, affidavits and papers to set aside the judgment of affirmance and for a stay of proceedings, and for leave to apply to the Superior Court to have the bill of exceptions resettled, so as to present those questions of law which were actually made at the trial, by exceptions there taken, and which were passed upon at the general term, &c. and cited Livingston agt. Miller, ante page 219. N. Hill Jk. for respondents, opposed the motion.

The court held the papers under advisement a few days, and denied the motion with $10 costs, with the following reasons:

After argument and judgment, this court will not set aside the judgment and stay proceedings, to enable the appellant to make an application to the court below to alter the statement of the exceptions taken at the trial.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clendenning v. Lindner
64 N.Y. St. Rep. 623 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1895)
Clendenning v. Lindner
31 N.Y.S. 844 (Superior Court of New York, 1895)
O'Gorman v. Kamak
5 Daly 517 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1875)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 How. Pr. 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitch-v-livingston-flanagan-ny-1853.