Fitch v. Cutting
This text of 103 P.3d 1169 (Fitch v. Cutting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Claimant compensably injured his back in 1995. In 2001, after his aggravation rights had expired, he filed a claim for additional compensation for a new or omitted medical condition. Liberty Northwest Insurance denied the claim. After a hearing, an administrative law judge (ALJ) set the denial aside and ordered Liberty to accept and process the claim. On appeal, the Workers’ Compensation Board vacated the order and dismissed the request for a hearing on the ground that the ALJ did not have jurisdiction over the claim once claimant’s aggravation rights expired. Instead, the issue was within the board’s own motion jurisdiction. We reverse and remand.
OAR 438-012-0090(1) became effective after the board’s decision in this case. That rule provides that a request for a hearing for a new medical condition or omitted medical condition that arises after the expiration of a claimant’s aggravation rights “shall be processed by the hearings division.” It applies to all requests for compensation under the board’s own motion jurisdiction that were “in existence or arose on or after” the effective date of the rules. OAR 438-.012-018(1). The parties agree that the rule governs this case. They also agree that, because the hearing that the rule contemplates has already occurred, we should remand the case for the board to review the merits of the ALJ’s order. We agree with the parties.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 P.3d 1169, 196 Or. App. 632, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 1632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitch-v-cutting-orctapp-2004.