Fiske v. Smythe
This text of 9 F. Cas. 172 (Fiske v. Smythe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After argument THE COURT charged the jury that the goods were not under the evidence, and in view of the cases cited, “ready-made clothing,” nor could they be liable to duty by similitude, under the act of 1842, because that law affected only non-enumerated articles, and these were enumerated under the title of wearing apparel; hence they were not dutiable as scarfs, and directed a verdict for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 F. Cas. 172, 15 Int. Rev. Rec. 115, 1872 U.S. App. LEXIS 1426, 1872 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fiske-v-smythe-circtsdny-1872.