Fisk v. West Bradley & Cary Manuf'g Co.
This text of 9 F. Cas. 168 (Fisk v. West Bradley & Cary Manuf'g Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
I see no sufficient grounds for interfering with the report of the master in this case, and the plaintiffs’ exceptions to the report are over[169]*169ruled. The plaintiffs are entitled to the costs of the cause to and including the interlocutory decree, and the defendant is entitled to recover its costs from and after such decree, the one hill to be set off against the other and the difference to be recovered by the party against whom it exists.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 F. Cas. 168, 19 O.G. 545, 1880 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 298, 1880 U.S. App. LEXIS 2878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisk-v-west-bradley-cary-manufg-co-circtsdny-1880.