Fisk v. Kissane

42 Ill. 87
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1866
StatusPublished

This text of 42 Ill. 87 (Fisk v. Kissane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fisk v. Kissane, 42 Ill. 87 (Ill. 1866).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Lawrence

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The only question presented by this record is as to the sufficiency of the affidavit as a foundation for reading in evidence the copy of a deed from the record. In the case of Dickinson v. Breden, 25 Ill. 186, it was held necessary to establish the fact of the existence, at some time, of an original before introducing a copy. Subsequently to that decision the law of 1861 was passed, the object of which was to relax the rule laid down by the court. It is in the power of the legislature to say upon what terms secondary evidence shall be admitted, and the affidavit in the present case is in compliance with the act of 1861. The copy from the records should have been admitted, subject of course to attack by the adverse party.

The judgment is reversed and the 'cause remanded. ' "

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dickinson v. Breeden
25 Ill. 186 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1860)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 Ill. 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisk-v-kissane-ill-1866.