Fishman v. United States
This text of 473 F. App'x 327 (Fishman v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ronald F. Fishman appeals the district court’s order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his Federal Tort Claims Act suit and the court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fishman v. United States, No. 5:08-ct-03115-BO, 2011 WL 2618897 (E.D.N.C. July 1, 2011); (Nov. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
473 F. App'x 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fishman-v-united-states-ca4-2012.