Fishman v. Hopson

32 So. 2d 913, 159 Fla. 817, 175 A.L.R. 695, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 968

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal questions a decree refusing specific performance of a contract to sell real estate. The chancellor considered the evidence and in the exercise of his judicial discretion denied the relief. We can not say that the conclusion reached is clearly erroneous and so the decree is affirmed.

TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, BUFORD, ADAMS and BARNS, JJ., concur.