Fishman v. Fishman

20 A.D.2d 941, 248 N.Y.S.2d 916
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 29, 1964·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Appeal from an order of Special Term, Supreme Court, denying a motion for a change of venue from Ulster to Westchester County on the ground there is reason to believe that an impartial trial cannot be had in Ulster County. The affidavit of the attorney for the defendant, as the main basis for the motion, alleged that his client cannot obtain a fair trial in Ulster County because the attorney for the plaintiff is employed by one of the Justices of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial District. The mere belief or feeling, such as expressed here, is not suffiicent grounds for the granting of the motion. (Noonan v. Luther, 128 App. Div. 673.) We perceive no reason for interfering with the exercise of the sound discretion of Special Term. Order affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fishman v. Fishman, 20 A.D.2d 941, 248 N.Y.S.2d 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

20 A.D.2d 941 (Fishman v. Fishman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Bernstein
9 A.D.3d 573 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Krupka v. County of Westchester
160 A.D.2d 681 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Thomas v. Small
121 A.D.2d 622 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Milazzo v. Long Island Lighting Co.
106 A.D.2d 495 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)