Fishman v. District of Columbia
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
JARED FISHMAN, Plaintiff
v. Civil Case No. 21-1847 (RJL) THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, and LIEUTENANT PATRICK LOFTUS, OFFICER MARCK JAEGER, OFFICER JEREMY BRADY, OFFICER MICHAEL TONG, and OFFICER CHRISTOPHER TODARO, of the Metropolitan Police Department
New Nee Nee Nee Ne ee Ne Ne ee Nee” Ne ee” ee” Ne” See”
Defendants
ORDER February 2, 2023 [Dkt. # 22]
For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion accompanying this Order, it is hereby
ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. # 22] is GRANTED as to Counts I, I], V, VII, and VII; it is further;
ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. # 22] is DENIED as to Counts III, TV, and VI.
SO ORDERED.
,
"(itbubpluoyl
RICHARD KDEON United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fishman v. District of Columbia (Fishman v. District of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.