Fishman v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided February 2, 2023·No. Civil Action No. 2021-1847·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

JARED FISHMAN, Plaintiff

v. Civil Case No. 21-1847 (RJL) THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, and LIEUTENANT PATRICK LOFTUS, OFFICER MARCK JAEGER, OFFICER JEREMY BRADY, OFFICER MICHAEL TONG, and OFFICER CHRISTOPHER TODARO, of the Metropolitan Police Department

New Nee Nee Nee Ne ee Ne Ne ee Nee” Ne ee” ee” Ne” See”

Defendants

ORDER February 2, 2023 [Dkt. # 22]

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion accompanying this Order, it is hereby

ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. # 22] is GRANTED as to Counts I, I], V, VII, and VII; it is further;

ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. # 22] is DENIED as to Counts III, TV, and VI.

SO ORDERED.

,

"(itbubpluoyl

RICHARD KDEON United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fishman v. District of Columbia, (D.D.C. 2023).

Fishman v. District of Columbia (Fishman v. District of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.