Fishman v. Davidson

85 A.2d 34, 369 Pa. 39, 1951 Pa. LEXIS 528
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 27, 1951·No. Appeal, 186·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We are all of the opinion that President Judge Smith of the court below adequately and correctly disposes of the questions raised on this appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fishman v. Davidson, 85 A.2d 34, 369 Pa. 39, 1951 Pa. LEXIS 528 (Pa. 1951).

85 A.2d 34 (Fishman v. Davidson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bost v. United States
178 A.3d 1156 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2018)
PATRIOT LEASING v. Jerry Enis Motors
928 So. 2d 856 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2006)
Bolus v. United Penn Bank
525 A.2d 1215 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1987)
Industrial Molded Plastic Products, Inc. v. J. Gross & Son, Inc.
398 A.2d 695 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
Todd v. Skelly
120 A.2d 906 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1956)
Maguire v. Osborne
121 A.2d 147 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1956)
Giehler v. Ward
77 So. 2d 452 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)
Peoples First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Gaudelli
110 A.2d 900 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1955)
Frame v. Langoma Lumber Co.
93 A.2d 891 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1953)